When is MacroFactor the better choice?
Choose MacroFactor if you want adaptive calorie coaching that adjusts your targets from your logged weight and intake. It has "more than 1,360,000 verified items" checked "by other humans", a Nutrient Explorer for micronutrients, typed or spoken "Describe" entry and AI photo logging, no ads and no free tier. Its own positioning: "the only app that makes calculations and adjustments based on what you actually did."
When is Macropass the better choice?
If you weigh your food and verify against labels, use MacroFactor or Cronometer. If you quit trackers because logging is a chore, or you already ask your AI what is in your food, Macropass is built for you. Macropass gives you a calorie estimate that shows its assumptions on every meal, different macro targets for training days and rest days as a saved schedule, no streaks, and a diary Claude or ChatGPT can write into. It does not adapt targets from your weight.
How do Macropass and MacroFactor compare feature by feature?
MacroFactor cells come from its website, help center and blog. Both apps are paid only; neither has a free tier or ads.
| Fact | Macropass | MacroFactor |
|---|---|---|
| Logging input | Describe: text, voice, photo. No database, no barcode | Search, barcode and label, typed or spoken "Describe", custom foods, "MacroFactor AI" photo with optional text |
| Shows the AI's assumptions per estimate | Yes: verbatim input, item list, stated assumptions, calorie band | Not documented by the vendor; editable per-food "Plate" editor |
| Correction in plain language | Yes, one sentence, before it counts | At request time ("alter portions, exclude foods"); afterwards manual edit |
| Food database | None, by design | "more than 1,360,000 verified items" |
| Micronutrients | No, six values | Yes, "Nutrient Explorer" |
| Macro targets by weekday | Yes, saved weekly schedule | No saved weekday schedule; targets can be edited day by day inside a program |
| Adaptive targets from logged weight | No; you set targets, or run the weight program alongside | Yes, the core of the product |
| Streaks or similar mechanics | None | Yes: "celebrate streaks" on the dashboard |
| Ads | None | None: "We will never serve ads" |
| Price and trial | $9.99/mo or $49.99/yr, 14-day trial | $11.99/mo, $47.99/6 mo, $71.99/yr; 7-day trial |
| Free tier | No | No: "there isn't (and will never be) a free version" |
| Claude or ChatGPT can log a meal over MCP | Yes: Claude, ChatGPT, custom MCP | None official; an unofficial community MCP server exists |
| Platforms | iPhone, Android | iOS, Android; no web app |
How do the prices compare?
On 2026-09-18, Macropass Pro is $49.99 per year against MacroFactor's $71.99 per year, and $9.99 per month against $11.99. Both offer a trial and neither has a free tier or ads. The price difference buys different things: MacroFactor's adaptive coaching and verified database versus Macropass's describe-to-log with stated assumptions and assistant logging.
Macropass vs MacroFactor questions
Is Macropass like MacroFactor?
Both are paid, ad-free macro trackers with no free tier. MacroFactor adapts your targets from your weight and uses a verified database; Macropass logs from a description and shows the AI's assumptions. If you weigh your food and verify against labels, use MacroFactor or Cronometer.
Does Macropass adjust my calories automatically?
No. Onboarding proposes targets; you keep or change them, per weekday if you like. The weight program tracks your trend against a goal but does not recompute targets on its own.
Does MacroFactor let ChatGPT log meals?
No official integration as of 2026-09-18; an unofficial community MCP server exists. Macropass has an official MCP connection for Claude, ChatGPT and custom clients.
Which is cheaper?
Macropass Pro at $49.99 per year versus MacroFactor at $71.99 per year on 2026-09-18. Monthly: $9.99 versus $11.99.
Does MacroFactor have streaks?
Yes, it celebrates streaks on its dashboard; its anti-shame claim is the "adherence-neutral" algorithm. Macropass has no streaks at all.
